'An Independent Baptist Church'
THE DOCTRINE OF THE GODHEAD AND THE TRINITY Did you know that the
strongest verse supporting the Trinity has been removed from the
THE DOCTRINE OF GOD'S MERCY AND
COMFORT OF THE SCRIPTURES
Over and over again, the NIV
presents God as a MEAN God......
Look at the following changes in
the newer versions when referring to God and His mercy and kindness.....Notice
the whole tone is changed...
Isaiah 26:3"Thou shalt keep
him in perfect peace , whose mind is stayed on thee: because he trusteth in
thee" is not in the NASV
Luke 4:18 Jesus came"...to
heal the brokenhearted..." is gone from NASV and NIV
Luke 8:48 "....Daughter,
be of good comfort....." is gone from NIV
Titus 1:4 "...Mercy..."
is gone from the NIV
Hebrew 3:10 God is "grieved
with that generation...." to.... God is "angry with that
generation.."
2 Corinthians 6:9
"...chastened.." to "chastened" and "beaten"
John 20:17 Jesus
said "touch me not" to "Stop clinging to me"
The Balm of Gilead of the
Scriptures.....the comfort that the Scriptures can give....is not leaving many
of the newer versions!
Here is a pattern in the newer
Bibles....you have to look harder to find the Truth you're looking for....
In the Old testament the Cities of
Refuge were located so that anyone would only have one day's journey to get to
one of the cities of refuge...I'm afraid in the newer Bibles it is becoming more
than a one day's journey to find the Truth you're looking for......All of the
verses have not been removed or altered on a subject or doctrine, but many of
the clearest ones have, thus making it harder to find the Truth you're looking
for.... This is sad.
THE DOCTRINE OF THE GODHEAD AND THE
TRINITY
Did you know that the strongest verse supporting the Trinity has been removed
from the NIV? Did you know that the word 'GODHEAD', which refers to the
Trinity, has been removed completely from the NIV? The NIV presents us
with a MEAN God?
The word JEHOVAH is gone completely from the NIV and NKJV!
We have the two main characters now
gone from the newer Bible versions....Jehovah and Lucifer!
The word 'Godhead' has been removed completely from the NIV and NASV, a
clear reference to the trinity, and replaced with 'divine being'.....For
example,
Acts 17:29 (KJV) "Forasmuch then as we are the offspring of God, we ought not to
think that the Godhead is like unto gold, or silver, or stone, graven by art and
man's device."
Acts 17:29 (NIV) "Therefore since we are God's offspring, we should not think
that the divine being is like gold or silver...."
(see also Rom 1:20; Col 2:9 for the same tricks...)
One of the strongest references to the Trinity was found in 1 John 5:7,8 and it
has been removed completely from the NIV and NASV, despite the fact that older
versions in the 2nd thru 5th century included it (Old Syriac, Old Latin,
Vulgate, Italic, etc) and a host of other Mss. witnesses! According
to Gail Riplinger, when newer Bible footnotes say it is NOT included in these
older witnesses, they do not tell something very deceitful that has happened.
A very few of the manuscripts of these witnesses are collated that do NOT have
the passage, and they say, therefore, it is not in these witnesses!
However, the great majority they did not pick for their collation DID have the
passage of 1 John 5:7,8! This is an outright lie to say these older
witnesses did not have 1 John 5:8 in the text! Amazing.
1 John 5:7 (KJV) "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father,
the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
1 John 5:7 (NIV) " "For there are three that testify." (rest of
verse missing)
Is the Lord's Prayer in your Bible?
Did you know that the newer Bibles pervert the Lord's Prayer into the Devil's
prayer? The "OUR FATHER" of the NIV Lord's Prayer in Luke 11 is "NOT IN HEAVEN"
and "DOES NOT DELIVER US FROM EVIL".... (Now who could that be?)
In Luke 11 you will notice that when the Alexandrian SCHOLARS were making their
altered text in the 2nd century, they chose to use a version of the prayer use
by Marcion, a 2nd Century Heretic who didn't believe in God the Father and God
the Son as portrayed in the Bible. Marcion took out the words referring to God
the Father being in heaven in this portion of Scripture. Notice that the parts
about God the Father being in heaven and delivering us from evil are removed...
Luke 11:2-4 (KJV) "And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which
art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in
heaven, so in earth. 3 Give us day by day our daily bread.
4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to
us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.
Get out the NIV or other so-called MODERN versions today, one will find Marcion's
mutilated prayer! Even a Satanist or occultist can pray Marcion's prayer
because it leaves out the Father in heaven. People can fill in the blank as
they wish. 'FATHER' is a term used by Buddhists, occultists, and even
Satanists. But there is only one "Father which art in
heaven."
The "OUR FATHER" of the NIV Lord's Prayer in Luke 11 is "NOT IN HEAVEN" and
"DOES NOT DELIVER US FROM EVIL".... Now I wonder who that could be???
The Bible version entitled The Message in Matthew 6:9 passage on the Lord's
Prayer actually inserted the occultic phrase used in Black Magic and witchcraft
and Satanic rituals, as well as in most lodges in their secret initiation
rituals.....'As above, so below'......
Wow...That's even scary.
Objection - A critic might ask "Why didn't the translator alter the Lord's
prayer out of the other Gospels if that was the true intent?
Good question. Could it be
that the one doing the altering didn't get to the other gospels yet? I
might ask the same question, "If the alter version of the Lord's prayer was
right in Luke, what was a longer version in the other gospels? Both of
them can't be right. One version of the lord's prayer must be wrong.
Wouldn't you agree?
THE DOCTRINE OF REDEMPTION THROUGH
CHRIST'S BLOOD
The 'BLOOD' has been removed in 40 key places in the NIV, and also 39 key
places in the NASV and 23 places NKJV. The Clearest reference to our redemption
by the Blood has been removed from the NIV. Wonderful bible terms like
REMISSION, REGENERATION, IMPUTE, PROPITIATION are no longer found in the NIV.....
The bible teaches that we are redeemed through Christ's shed blood. Salvation is
only through Jesus' blood as Hebrews 9:22 says WITHOUT THE SHEDDING OF
BLOOD IS NO REMISSION OF SINS. The NIV
removes the fact that we are redeemed 'through his blood' in Colossians
1:14, one of the clearest verses on the blood redemption in the Bible! It's
been removed in the NIV...
Colossians 1:14 (KJV) "In whom we have redemption through his blood, even the
forgiveness of sins:"
Colossians 1:14 (NIV) "In whom we have redemption, the forgiveness of sins"
(Gone is through his BLOOD)
The NIV and other new Bibles change the wonderful words 'washed us
from our sins in his own blood', to LOOSED or FREED us
from our sins.
Revelation 1:5 (KJV) "...Unto him that loved us, and washed
us from our sins in his own blood."
Revelation 1:5 (NIV) "...to him who loves us and has freed us
from our sins by his blood."
What can wash away my sin? Nothing but the blood of Jesus!
In fact, the NIV removes wonderful bible terms like REMISSION,
REGENERATION, IMPUTE, PROPITIATION, and many others....
These precious words found in the KJV.....are no longer found in many of the
newer Bibles...
An important note.....
Now listen, since these precious terms our not in the NIV today, theology
Seminary text books based upon the NIV will no longer teach about
these great words......
THE DOCTRINE OF THE DEITY OF CHRIST
Did you know that The NIV teaches that Jesus sinned? Did you realize that
over and over again, the clearest verses referring to Jesus' deity have been
removed or altered in the newer Bible versions?
1 Timothy 3:16 is one of the clearest verses in the entire Bible showing the
Deity of Christ! As far as I know, the KJV is the only Bible that reads the
verse correctly that 'God was manifest in the flesh'...despite the fact that
293 out of 300 Mss. witnesses we have today read exactly as KJV does.....
1 Timothy 3:16 (KJV) "And without controversy great is the mystery of
godliness: God was manifest in the flesh...."
1 Timothy 3:16 (NIV) "Beyond all question, the mystery of godliness is great:
He appeared in a body...."
So what? Everyone has appeared in a body!
Did Jesus ever Sin?
If He did, then He was not God, for God cannot sin!
Did you realize that the NIV teaches that Jesus sinned?
It sure does.
In Matthew 5:22 the KJV teaches that anyone who is angry with his brother
without a cause is in the wrong and in danger of judgment!
The NIV removes the phrase ''WITHOUT A CAUSE' and therefore teaches that
anyone who is angry with his brother is in danger of the judgment!
When we compare the altered NIV verse in Matthew 5:22 with Mark 3:5, it says
that Jesus turned about to religious leaders with anger.....
In the KJV that is okay and is not sin, because Jesus 'had a rightful cause'
to be angry with them...
However, the NIV removed that crucial phrase 'without a cause' and therefore
making Jesus a sinner! Look at it...
Mark 3:5 (KJV) "And when he had looked round about on them with anger, being
grieved for the hardness of their hearts,
Now compare this with Matthew 5:22 (KJV) "But I say unto you, That whosoever is
angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment:.."
But see how the NIV leaves out the crucial phrase 'without a cause' in
Matthew 5:22 (NIV) "But I tell you that anyone who is angry with his brother
will be subject to judgment."
Wow! That is blasphemy!
Notice this subtle change in Luke
2:22 that changes the verse to imply that Jesus and Mary both needed to go
through the process of purification after birth...implying Jesus was a sinner
just like Mary and the rest of us...by changing the word HER to....THEIR....
Luke 2:22 (KJV) "And when the days of her purification according
to the law of Moses were accomplished..."
Luke 2:22 (NIV) "When the time of THEIR purification according to
the Law of Moses had been completed..."
Did baby Jesus need 'purification'?
A clear verse declaring Jesus' deity is Philippians 2:6, but the NIV changes
it completely...
Philippians 2:6 (KJV) "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to
be equal with God:
Philippians 2:6 (NIV) "Who being in very nature God, did not consider equality
with God something to be grasped..."
What?
This sentence doesn't even make sense!
Mormons and Jehovah Witnesses denies the fact that Jesus is God. That is why
the Jehovah Witnesses removed or changed every reference to Jesus' Deity in
their New World Translation (NWT). Amazingly, in John 1:18, the
New American
Standard Bible (NASB) uses the same wording as the NWT...
John 1:18 (KJV) "No man hath seen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which
is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him."
John 1:18 (NASV) "No man has seen God at any time; the only begotten God, who is
in the bosom of the Father."
One Christian leader objected and
said the NASV reading better supports the deity of Christ! No Way.......
That verse doesn't help support the deity of Christ! It is the very same
reading as the Jehovah Witness NEW WORLD TRANSLATION!
Is Jesus MASTER....or just a TEACHER...?
Can anyone tell why 46 times in the NIV the title "Master" for our Lord Jesus
Christ has been changed to 'Teacher'? A TEACHER is quite different from
being one's master!
Is Jesus to be worshipped?
In 7 places in the New Testament, the phrase 'worshipped Him' has been
removed....
One example is Matthew 9:18 (KJV) "
While he spake these things unto them, behold, there came a certain ruler, and
worshipped him, saying, My daughter is even now dead: but come and lay thy hand
upon her, and she shall live.
Matthew 9:18 (NASV) "While he was saying these things to them, behold, there
came a synagogue official, and bowed down before him....."
The NIV replaces 'WORSHIPPED HIM' with 'BOWING DOWN BEFORE'........Wait a
minute, WORSHIPPING someone is not the same as bowing down before them...
I would bow down before the Queen of England but I would not worship her!
How about one of the strongest verses in the Bible regarding the Deity of Jesus
Christ in Revelation 1:6 which declares that Jesus is the The first and the
last.....the Alpha and Omega.....which is the SAME term used for Jehovah in the
Old Testament in Isaiah 44:6.....The NIV removes the essential
phrase...incredible..!!
Revelation 1:11 (KJV) "Saying, I am Alpha and Omega, the first and the last:
and, What thou seest, write in a book, and send it unto the seven churches which
are in Asia;..."
Revelation 1:11 (NIV) "which said: "Write on a scroll what you see and send it
to the seven churches..."
The phrase about Jesus is gone!
It is gone in the NASV too!
Now removing that phrase is crucial, because Isaiah 44:6 declares
'The first
and the last' is Jehovah....meaning Jesus is the Jehovah God of the Old
Testament!
Isaiah 44:6(KJV) " Thus saith the LORD the King of Israel, and his redeemer the LORD
of hosts; I am the first, and I am the last; and beside me there is no God.
What about Revelation 1:6 where the KJV reads 'unto God and his Father'...a
clear reference to the deity of Jesus...
The NIV changes it completely......
Revelation 1:6 (KJV) "And hath made us kings and priests unto God and his
Father; to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. Amen."
Notice how this is a clear reference to Jesus being God.....
Now listen how the NIV changes it completely..
Revelation 1:6 (NIV) "....and has made us to be kingdom and priests to serve
his
God and Father...."
Wow! Changed that verse, didn't it?
In John 1:14 the Word of God
clearly says Jesus was the only begotten Son of the Father, the NIV and NASV
changes it simply to read, "THE ONE AND ONLY"...
John 1:14 (KJV) "And
the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory
as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
John 1:14 (NIV)
".....we have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only...."
John 9:35 (KJV) calls Jesus the Son of God, and this reading is based upon
numerous Manuscript authority according to Dr. Samuel Gipp , but the NIV and
NASV changes it to read 'the Son of Man'
despite, as Dr. Gipp says, the reading is backed upheld by one Twentieth Century
Greek scholar.
John 7:53 - 8:11 is a clear passage teaching the deity of Christ because He
forgave the adulterous woman of her sins...and only God can forgive sins....yet
the footnotes of the newer versions omit it from the true text. Yet Dr. Edward
Hills in his well-documented book THE KING JAMES VERSION DEFENDED notes that
these footnotes doubting the authenticity of this verse are completely
misleading! Textual Scholar Hermann Von Snoden verifies that this passage in
John 7:53 - 8:1 stands in the great majority of the Manuscripts...
John 7:53 - 8:1 (KJV) and said unto them, He that is
without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. 8 And again he
stooped down, and wrote on the grou"And every man went unto his own house.
8:1 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives. 2 And early in the morning he came
again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and
taught them. 3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in
adultery; and when they had set her in the midst, 4 They say unto him, Master,
this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act. 5 Now Moses in the law
commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou? 6 This they
said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down,
and with his finger wrote on the ground, as though he heard them not. 7 So when
they continued asking him, he lifted up himself. 9 And they which heard it, being
convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest,
even unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the
midst. 10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said
unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee? 11
She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go,
and sin no more.
THE DOCTRINE OF CHRIST'S DEITY
IN THE OLD TESTAMENT
The Old Testament even attacks
the deity of Christ when the NIV and the NASV changes Daniel 3:25 from 'the Son
of God' to 'a son of the gods'...
Daniel 3:25 (KJV) "He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose,
walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the
fourth is like the Son of God."
Daniel 3:25 (NIV) "He said, "Look! I see four men walking around
in the fire, unbound and unharmed, and the fourth looks like a son of the
gods."
THE DOCTRINE OF THE ETERNALITY OF CHRIST
Did you realize that the NIV denies the eternality of Jesus Christ?
As the second member of the Trinity, Jesus as God has always existed and had no
beginning.
Micah 5:2 (KJV) "But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the
thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to be
ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.
Listen to what the NIV does to the eternality of Christ....
Micah 5:2 (NIV) ".....from you shall come forth for me one who is to be ruler in
Israel, whose origin is from of old, from ancient days."
Now friend, 'from of old, from ancient days' is a little different than
'from
everlasting'...would you agree?
THE DOCTRINE OF HEAVEN
No doctrine affected by the changes in the newer versions? Newer versions do
away with our MANSIONS and change them simply into rooms or just...dwelling
places. The reference to HEAVEN being a better place with reward awaiting us is
removed...
John 14:2 KJV) "In my Father's house are many MANSIONS: if
it were not so, I would have told you, I go to prepare a place for you."
Is there a difference between a MANSION and simply a ROOM?
John 14:2 (NIV) "In my Father's house are many rooms; if it
were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to prepare a place for
you."
Hebrews 10:34 (KJV) "...knowing in yourselves that ye have in
heaven a better and an enduring substance."
Hebrew 10:34 (NIV) "...because you knew that you yourselves had
better and lasting possessions." (IN HEAVEN has been removed)
THE DOCTRINE OF FINAL JUDGMENT
The NIV confuses the Bema Judgment of Christ with the Great White Throne
Judgment.
Romans 14:10-12 clearly teaches about the Judgment Seat of Christ for the
Christian. The NIV removes 'of Christ' and confuses this judgment with the
final judgment of God at the Great White Throne Judgment.
Romans 14:10-12 (KJV) "But why dost thou judge thy brother? or why dost thou set
at nought thy brother? for we shall all stand before the judgment seat of
Christ. 11 For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow
to me, and every tongue shall confess to God. 12 So then every one of us shall
give account of himself to God.
Romans 14:10-12 (NIV) "...for we will all stand before God's Judgment seat."
THE DOCTRINE OF CREATION
Did you realize that the new Bible versions change key verses to open the
possibility that Jesus used EVOLUTION to create the world? ...and that the
Muslim god or Hindu god could have created the universe?
Colossians 1:16 (KJV)
"For by him were all things created, that are in
heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible,
Listen to the RSV however....
Colossians 1:16 (RSV) "....for in him all things were created...all things were
created THRU Him"
Now 'all things were created BY HIM' is a little different from 'all
things were created IN HIM'... or 'through him' as RSV reads...
Ephesians 3:9 in the KJV clearly says Jesus Christ created all things...while
the NIV just says that God created everything....
Ephesians 3:9 (KJV) "And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the
mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created
all things by Jesus Christ:
Ephesians 3:9 (NIV) "...the mystery which for ages has been hidden in God, who
created all things."
Which God? The Muslim god or
Hindu god?
Which Bible version is clearer as to WHETHER Jesus Created everything?
THE DOCTRINE OF THE VIRGIN BIRTH
Did you realize that the newer Bible versions deny the Virgin Birth of Jesus?
They teach that Joseph was Jesus’ father and that Mary was not a virgin when
Jesus was born?
Isaiah 7:14 clearly says Jesus was born of a virgin, one of the strongest proofs
of His Deity! The RSV changes it to read that Jesus was born of a YOUNG WOMAN!
Since when is that a proof of Deity?
Isaiah 7:14 (KJV) "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a
virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel."
The amazing thing is that the same Hebrew word here for VIRGIN is ALMA, and each
of the other 3 times it is found in the Bible it is translated VIRGIN.
Even in
Matthew 1:23 where Jesus quotes Isaiah 7:14, the RSV translates it here as
VIRGIN !!!!
(If you're going to alter a verse
in the Bible, you'd better be alter it where it is quoted elsewhere in the Bible
too.....)
In Luke 2:33 The KJV correctly says implies Joseph was not Jesus' biological
father, but yet the NIV changes the verse to imply Joseph was the biological
parent!
Luke 2:33 (KJV) "And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were
spoken of him."
Luke 2:33 (NIV) "The child's father and mother marveled at what was said about
him."
Luke 2:34 does the same thing when the KJV says "Joseph and his mother" is
replaced in the NIV with "His parents"......
Matthew 1:25 (KJV) says that Jesus was Mary's Firstborn Son, but the NIV
removes the word 'FIRSTBORN' and just says Mary "gave birth to a son"
Luke 1:34 (KJV) teaches that Mary was a virgin when she was pregnant with Jesus
because she said, "How can this be seeing I know not a man?" The NIV reads,
"How can this be, since I have no husband?"
There's a lot of difference between never having known a man (sexually) and
not having a husband at the present time.......
THE BIBLE TEACHING OF SEXUAL PURITY AND
SEXUAL PERVERSION
Did you know that newer Bibles have
become POLITICALLY CORRECT and removed offensive references to homosexuality?
Did you know that the term 'Sodomite' as found in the KJV is no longer found in
the newer Bible? FORNICATION and ADULTERY have been replaced by the less
offensive 'IMMORALITY'. 'Whoremonger' has been replaced with 'immoral person'.
Did you know that the NIV Teen Study Bible defines sex as "Another fun thing
mean adults tell teenagers to keep away from." ???
The newer Bibles have become POLITICALLY CORRECT on the matter of sexual
perversion and have replaced the OFFENSIVE descriptions of homosexuality such as
'them that defile themselves with mankind' with the non-offensive term "homosexual'...
1 Timothy 1:10 (KJV) "For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with
mankind, for menstealers, for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any
other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;
1 Timothy 1:10 (NASB) - replaces 'them that defile themselves with mankind'
with 'homosexual'.
Which reading do you think is less offensive to you if you were a homosexual?
The offensive term 'SODOMITE' has been removed from the NIV and replaced
with 'prostitute'..
Deuteronomy 23:17 (KJV) "There shall be no whore of the daughters of Israel, nor
a sodomite of the sons of Israel.
(See also 1 Kings 14:24; 15:12; 22:46; 2 Kings 23:7)
1 Corinthians 6:9 (KJV) "effiminate, abusers of themselves with mankind..." is
replaced in the NIV with the less offensive "....male prostitutes nor homosexual
offenders.." (1 Corinthians 6:9 - NIV)
Notice the NIV in 1 Corinthians 6:9 does not condemn HOMOSEXUALS
or the ACT OF
HOMOSEXUALITY...
but only homosexual OFFENDERS....
What is that in the NIV Teen Study Bible?
SHOCKER - The NIV Teen Study Bible (1993 Edition) states on one of its extra
explanatory pages THE ALTERNATIVE DEFINITION of sex:
"Another fun thing mean adults tell teenagers to keep away from."
You've got to be kidding?
The offensive 'WHOREMONGER" in the KJV is replaced with the more politically
correct 'IMMORAL PERSON' in Eph. 5:5; 1 Tim. 1:10; Rev. 21:8; Rev. 22:15
The Dictionary definition for FORNICATION is 'Illicit sexual intercourse on
the part of an unmarried person'. That is pretty blunt. Therefore,
Fornication of the KJV has been replaced with the less offensive
'IMMORALITY'
in all the 21 places it is found in the NT. (1 Corinthians 6:18 & others)
The NASB calls 'natural' what God calls SIN.....
James 3:15 (KJV) ...."Sensual" James 3:15 (NASB)..."natural"
THE DOCTRINE OF INERRANCY OF THE
BIBLE
Did you realize there are errors in the NIV?
The NIV changes Mark 1:2,3 into a lie...making the Bible have an untrue
statement!
Mark 1:2,3 (NIV) reads "It is written in Isaiah the prophet: I will send
my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way - a voice calling in the
desert., send my messenger ahead of you, who will prepare your way."
This statement is NOT written in Isaiah! It is written in Malachi
3:1.
The King James correctly reads "As
it is written in the prophets"....
Another lie is found in 2 Samuel 21:19 in the NIV when it reads, "Elhanan
son of Jaare-Oregim the Bethlemhemite killed Goliath the Gittite, who had a
spear with a shaft like a weaver's rod."
Every Sunday School student knows DAVID killed Goliath!
These are clear and obvious errors and lies in the NIV. There are no
errors or mistakes in the King James Bible.
THE TEACHING THAT THINGS OF GOD
ARE HOLY
Thru the new Bible versions we
see 'Holy' become an archaic word that is done away with.....
We are taught in 1 Corinthians that
God is HOLY
The Scriptures are HOLY in 2
Timothy 3:15
But 2 Timothy 3:2 (KJV) says
men will become UNHOLY in these last days....
Notice the following changes in the
newer Bibles....
2 Peter 1:21 "Holy men of
God" to "men of God"
Matthew 25:31 "Holy angels" to
"angels"
Revelation 18:20 "Holy apostles" to
"apostles"
John 7:39 "Holy Spirit" to "Spirit"
(same thing in 1 Cor. 12:3, Matt. 12:31,32, Acts 6:3,5, Acts 8:15-19)
THE DOCTRINE OF THE END TIMES ECUMENICAL
MOVEMENT AND THE MOVE TOWARD THE ONE-WORLD CHURCH
Throughout the newer Bibles we see the TOLERANCE stressed and divisiveness
over Bible doctrine condemned as we move toward the Ecumenism of the predicted
one-world Church.
Titus 3:10 (KJV) says we are to reject a HERETIC.....(someone who denies
fundamental Bible Truths and Doctrines)
The NKJV changes the verse to read in Titus 3:10 (NKJV) to read we are to
'reject
a divisive man'!
Well, The Bible believing Christian who takes a stand against heresy and false
teaching is considered by many today as a 'divisive man"...
That's talking about you and me!
What Acts 24:14 (KJV) calls 'heresy' is simply called a
'sect' in the NKJV in Acts 24:14 (NKJV)
Remember, we must be politically correct and not 'judge' others...
Instead of 'heathens' in Acts 4:25 (KJV) we read 'nations' in
Acts 4:25
(NKJV).
That is certainly more
accommodating and less offensive to the pagan peoples and religions of the
world, isn't it?
Over and over again in the newer
Bibles we read more and more INCLUSIVE language......language that
accepts the other religions of the world.....as we prepare for the Antichrist's
ONE WORLD CHURCH....spoken of in the Book of Revelation! This is what
today's ecumenical movement is all about......When we see groups like PROMISE
KEEPERS urging all faiths to come together and break down denominational
walls, we see Romans Catholics, Disciples of Christ, and Mormons all joining
together....and and each of these groups teach different plans of
salvation!
That is why the newer versions say
simply 'BELIEVE' instead of 'believe in Jesus Christ' .........or 'the GOSPEL'
instead of the GOSPEL OF CHRIST'......or 'KINGDOM OF HEAVEN' to simply
'kingdom'......
The newer versions are becoming
acceptable to all the world's religions.....
THE NEWER BIBLES AND ROMAN CATHOLICISM
Did you know that the newer Bible versions follow the Roman Catholic Bible and
support the teaching of Mary as Co-Mediatrix with Jesus to purge our sins? They
support that idea that Mary was above other women, and support the Catholic
doctrine CONFESSIONS OF SIN to a priest and that Baptism is a SACRAMENT (Channel
of Grace).... and support celibacy and visions?
The 5 man committee which revises
the Greek Text for the NIV is headed by men in their late 80's and the youngest
man is 70 at the time of this writing. He is Carlo Maria Martini, whom
Time Magazine said in its January 1995 issue 'Carlo Maria Martini is next in
line to be the pope'. Carlo Martini made the following quote
"Fundamentalists are dangerous". Here we have the youngest man on
the committee revising the text behind the NIV lined up to most likely be the
next pope......is it any wonder the following changes are in the NIV?
Hebrews 1:3 (KJV) teaches that Jesus BY HIMSELF purged our sins. The newer
versions remove the phrase 'BY HIMSELF' and opens up the possibility of Mary
being CO-MEDIATRIX along with Jesus...
Hebrews 1:3 (KJV) "Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image
of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had
by
himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high:
Hebrews 1:3 (NIV, NASB) removes 'by himself'...
Notice how they read....
Hebrews 1:3 (NASV)
"....when He had made purification of sins..."
When referring to Mary...
Luke 1:28 (KJV) reads 'blessed are thou AMONG women'
Notice this crucial verse does not say Mary was favored 'ABOVE' women...
However, the NASV reads a little
differently...!!
Luke 1:28 (NASV) ".......'Hail,
favored one! The Lord is with you.."
Luke 1:28 (NIV) "....you who are
highly favored!"
Notice the newer versions somehow
leave out the comparison of Mary to other women......
The Catholic Bible supports the teaching of Mary as C0-Mediatrix and QUEEN OF
HEAVEN in.....
Genesis 3:15 (Catholic Bible) when it reads "SHE shall crush thy head and thou shalt lie in wait for
HER heel.."
Who is the SAVIOR who bruises Satan's heel??? Amazing.
But the King James Bible reads much differently....
Genesis 3:15 (KJV) "...her SEED; it shall bruise thy head and thou shalt bruise
HIS heel..."
James 5:16 in the KJV reads
we are to confess our faults one to another, but the Newer Bibles, NIV, NASV,
(Even the NEW SCOFIELD REFERENCE BIBLE) changes it to read CONFESS YOU SINS to
one another.
James 5:16 (KJV)
"Confess your faults one to another..."
Listen to what the New Scofield,
NIV, and NASV read...
James 5:16 (NIV)
"Confess your SINS one to another...."
Confession of SINS has been a
teaching of Roman Catholicism for Centuries! Dr. Samuel Gipp in his book
UNDERSTANDING THE HISTORY OF THE BIBLE (p 212) notes that all
Greek Manuscripts and texts have the Greek word for FAULTS (Paraptomata) .....Nestle's
text inserts 'SINS' (Taxamartias) with NO manuscript authority.......
Did you hear that? No
Manuscript on earth has that reading! Dr. Gipp adds, "Anyone
accepting an alternate reading with no evidence CANNOT be credited with
acting ethically or scholarly." (ibid)
What about 'visions' of
Fatima and others today....?????"
Colossians 2:18 (KJV) reads 'things which he hath not seen'..
whereas Colossians 2:18 (NIV, NASB) reads 'visions which he hath seen'
Celibacy and the Bible?
1 Corinthians 7:1 (KJV)
"....it is good for a man not to
touch a woman"
1 Corinthians 7:1 (NIV)
"...it is good for a man not to marry"
THE DOCTRINE OF SPREADING GOD'S WORD IN
THE GREAT COMMISSION
With nearly 2000 language groups with no Bible in their language,
the Scripture implores us to take the Gospel to every creature. We are
commissioned to translate God's Word into these other languages.
The King James Bible is the only English Bible on the face of the earth that
is not copyrighted....anyone can print and publish it, anytime, anywhere....
All of the newer Bible versions today have a copyright, meaning a certain
amount of the text has been changed, in order to get that new copyright.....SO
PROFIT CAN BE MADE!
Did you know that the company that
publishes the NIV (Zondervan) is owned by people who publish the Satanic Bible?
(check www.jesus-is-lord.com
for verification for this)
IS THE ANTICHRIST'S FINAL BIBLE VERSION
ON THE WAY?
Did you realize that right now....plans are in progress...for a final
"UNIVERSAL BIBLE" that has been called for by U.N. Assistant Secretary General
Robert Muller?
The NIV translators say "the word of translation is never wholly finished." (NIV,
p. X) The few Greek Manuscripts underlying new versions contain yet unreleased
material which is an exact blueprint for the Antichrist's One World Religion. A
complete translation of these is being called for by new version editors. This
new version could be the final 'universal bible' called for by U.N.
Assistant Secretary General Robert Muller. The New Age boasts of their plans
for a new bible from the 'archaeological archives'. (When Humanity Comes
of Age, p 39)
"If so many discoveries have been made in our generation, there is every
reason to HOPE that more discoveries may still be awaiting in the sands of
Egypt." (The Text of the Bible, p
256, Kenyon)
Why the 'sands of Egypt'?
The stage is set for the Antichrist to pull back the veil and launch his final
version of the story....
YOU MUST DECIDE.......
Well my friend, you have looked at the changes made in the newer Bible versions.
What do you think? Do you still believe 'there are no essential doctrines
affected by the newer Bible versions'?
You decide. I must admit I am horrified.
Dr. Frank Logsdon was co-founder of
THE NEW AMERICAN STANDARD VERSION. As people began confronting
Dr. Logsdon on some of the NASV's serious omissions and errors, he re-examined
the evidence and this was his verdict:
"I must under God denounce every attachment to the New American Standard
Version. I'm afraid I'm in trouble with the Lord....it is wrong, terribly
wrong; its frighteningly wrong...the deletions are absolutely
frightening....there are so many...Are we so naive that we do not suspect
Satanic deception in all of this?"
Dr. Frank Logsdon
Co-Founder, New American Standard Version
| 
